Michael Rasmussen β€” Anytime Goalscorer

det C NHL

View real-time betting odds, AI-powered projections, and historical performance data for Michael Rasmussen's Anytime Goalscorer.

Projections

Anytime Goalscorer
0.11
0.0 Floor
0.1 Projection
1.0 Ceiling
Range Distribution
0.1
0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
Probability Ranges
Very Unlikely 0.0 – 0.0
Bottom 10%
Below Average 0.0 – 0.0
10th–25th
Most Likely 0.0 – 0.0
25th–75th
Above Average 0.0 – 1.0
75th–90th
Exceptional 1.0 – 1.0
Top 10%

Game Logs

Betting Odds

Anytime Goalscorer

All Lines
0.5
Sportsbook Over 0.5 Under 0.5 Vig
+1100
- -
+1000
- -
+1000
- -
+1000
- -
+900
- -
+900
- -
+810
- -
+630
-1400
7.0%
+575
- -
+575
- -
+575
- -

Frequently Asked Questions

Where can I find Michael Rasmussen Anytime Goalscorer odds today?

This page shows live Michael Rasmussen Anytime Goalscorer odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.

How are Michael Rasmussen Anytime Goalscorer projections calculated?

Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Michael Rasmussen's Anytime Goalscorer so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.

What sportsbooks offer Michael Rasmussen Anytime Goalscorer props?

Optimal Bet compares Michael Rasmussen Anytime Goalscorer lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current NHL schedule.

Should I bet the over or under on Michael Rasmussen Anytime Goalscorer?

Use the projections section above to see how Michael Rasmussen's projected Anytime Goalscorer compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.