Kennedy Chandler Double Double
Kennedy Chandler is projected for 0.4 double double. He has cleared 0.5 in 1 of his last 10 games (10%).
Kennedy Chandler projections and betting odds for Double Double. Compare lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and other sportsbooks.
Props & Odds
Double Double O/U 0.5
0.4projHit rate vs Over 0.5
- Last 5
- 20% 1 of 5
- Last 10
- 10% 1 of 10
- Last 20
- 5% 1 of 20
- Last 55
- 2% 1 of 55
Projected range
projection 0.4Most likely 0.0–1.0 Typical 0.0–1.0
Recent games
| Opp | Date | W/L | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | P+A | P+R | A+R | P+A+R | STL | BLK | S+B | 3PM | TO | DD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs MEM | 04-11 | W | 41 | 26 | 10 | 5 | 36 | 31 | 15 | 41 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 |
| @ NO | 04-08 | L | 43 | 31 | 8 | 7 | 39 | 38 | 15 | 46 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| @ OKC | 04-05 | L | 20 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ HOU | 04-04 | L | 25 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs DEN | 04-02 | L | 32 | 16 | 6 | 5 | 22 | 21 | 11 | 27 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs CLE | 03-31 | L | 40 | 12 | 5 | 4 | 17 | 16 | 9 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| @ PHO | 03-29 | L | 24 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 19 | 14 | 11 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| @ DEN | 03-28 | L | 29 | 16 | 7 | 1 | 23 | 17 | 8 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs WAS | 03-26 | L | 34 | 14 | 8 | 1 | 22 | 15 | 9 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs TOR | 03-24 | L | 29 | 13 | 9 | 5 | 22 | 18 | 14 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs PHI | 03-22 | L | 37 | 19 | 4 | 5 | 23 | 24 | 9 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs MIN | 10-17 | W | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs ORL | 10-10 | L | 30 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 21 | 18 | 7 | 23 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| vs NY | 10-04 | L | 33 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 21 | 18 | 9 | 24 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| @ NY | 10-02 | L | 21 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 3 | 13 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| @ MIL | 04-08 | W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ NO | 04-06 | L | 10 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ CHI | 04-02 | L | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs LAC | 03-30 | L | 13 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs HOU | 03-25 | W | 10 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs GS | 03-19 | W | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ MIA | 03-15 | L | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ DAL | 03-13 | W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs GS | 03-10 | W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ DEN | 03-04 | L | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FAQ
Where can I find Kennedy Chandler Double Double odds today?
This page shows live Kennedy Chandler Double Double odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.
How are Kennedy Chandler Double Double projections calculated?
Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Kennedy Chandler's Double Double so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.
What sportsbooks offer Kennedy Chandler Double Double props?
Optimal Bet compares Kennedy Chandler Double Double lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current NBA schedule.
Should I bet the over or under on Kennedy Chandler Double Double?
Use the projections section above to see how Kennedy Chandler's projected Double Double compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.