Immanuel Quickley Points
Immanuel Quickley is projected for 10.7 points. He has cleared 10.5 in 6 of his last 10 games (60%).
Immanuel Quickley projections and betting odds for Points. Compare lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and other sportsbooks.
Props & Odds
Points O/U 10.5
10.7projHit rate vs Over 10.5
- Last 5
- 60% 3 of 5
- Last 10
- 60% 6 of 10
- Last 20
- 75% 15 of 20
- Last 109
- 82% 89 of 109
Projected range
projection 10.7Most likely 7.4–14.1 Typical 4.3–17.2
Recent games
| Opp | Date | W/L | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | P+A | P+R | A+R | P+A+R | STL | BLK | S+B | 3PM | TO | DD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs BKN | 04-12 | W | 17 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs MIA | 04-09 | W | 23 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 7 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs MIA | 04-07 | W | 18 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ PHO | 03-23 | L | 26 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 14 | 4 | 15 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ DEN | 03-21 | L | 34 | 15 | 8 | 4 | 23 | 19 | 12 | 27 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ CHI | 03-19 | W | 26 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 17 | 12 | 9 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs DET | 03-15 | W | 34 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 13 | 7 | 8 | 14 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs PHO | 03-13 | W | 38 | 17 | 1 | 4 | 18 | 21 | 5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ NO | 03-12 | L | 34 | 25 | 3 | 6 | 28 | 31 | 9 | 34 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ HOU | 03-11 | L | 33 | 12 | 6 | 4 | 18 | 16 | 10 | 22 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs DAL | 03-08 | W | 31 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 18 | 12 | 10 | 20 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ MIN | 03-06 | L | 30 | 18 | 7 | 3 | 25 | 21 | 10 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs NY | 03-04 | L | 33 | 13 | 12 | 3 | 25 | 16 | 15 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 |
| @ WAS | 03-01 | W | 37 | 27 | 11 | 2 | 38 | 29 | 13 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| vs SA | 02-26 | L | 37 | 20 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 24 | 4 | 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs OKC | 02-25 | L | 33 | 17 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 20 | 7 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| @ MIL | 02-22 | W | 31 | 32 | 9 | 3 | 41 | 35 | 12 | 44 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ CHI | 02-20 | W | 33 | 14 | 3 | 2 | 17 | 16 | 5 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs DET | 02-12 | L | 32 | 18 | 5 | 2 | 23 | 20 | 7 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs IND | 02-08 | W | 28 | 13 | 6 | 4 | 19 | 17 | 10 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs CHI | 02-06 | W | 31 | 24 | 5 | 2 | 29 | 26 | 7 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs MIN | 02-05 | L | 34 | 23 | 8 | 5 | 31 | 28 | 13 | 36 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs UTA | 02-01 | W | 33 | 17 | 4 | 5 | 21 | 22 | 9 | 26 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| @ ORL | 01-31 | L | 33 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 19 | 20 | 13 | 26 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs NY | 01-29 | L | 30 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 10 | 11 | 7 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
FAQ
Where can I find Immanuel Quickley Points odds today?
This page shows live Immanuel Quickley Points odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.
How are Immanuel Quickley Points projections calculated?
Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Immanuel Quickley's Points so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.
What sportsbooks offer Immanuel Quickley Points props?
Optimal Bet compares Immanuel Quickley Points lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current NBA schedule.
Should I bet the over or under on Immanuel Quickley Points?
Use the projections section above to see how Immanuel Quickley's projected Points compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.