Walter Clayton Jr. Rebounds
Walter Clayton Jr. is projected for 3.8 rebounds. He has cleared 3.5 in 1 of his last 10 games (10%).
Walter Clayton Jr. projections and betting odds for Rebounds. Compare lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and other sportsbooks.
Props & Odds
Rebounds O/U 3.5
3.8projHit rate vs Over 3.5
- Last 5
- 0% 0 of 5
- Last 10
- 10% 1 of 10
- Last 20
- 5% 1 of 20
- Last 73
- 15% 11 of 73
Projected range
projection 3.8Most likely 1.8–5.9 Typical 0.0–7.7
Recent games
| Opp | Date | W/L | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | P+A | P+R | A+R | P+A+R | STL | BLK | S+B | 3PM | TO | DD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ DEN | 04-09 | L | 22 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 18 | 17 | 5 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs CLE | 04-07 | L | 25 | 10 | 11 | 1 | 21 | 11 | 12 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
| @ MIL | 04-05 | L | 25 | 20 | 4 | 3 | 24 | 23 | 7 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| vs NY | 04-02 | L | 23 | 10 | 5 | 1 | 15 | 11 | 6 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs PHO | 03-31 | L | 30 | 11 | 7 | 3 | 18 | 14 | 10 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| vs CHI | 03-29 | W | 30 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 13 | 10 | 9 | 16 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| vs HOU | 03-28 | L | 23 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs SA | 03-26 | L | 22 | 10 | 6 | 2 | 16 | 12 | 8 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| @ ATL | 03-23 | L | 28 | 16 | 6 | 1 | 22 | 17 | 7 | 23 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| @ CHA | 03-21 | L | 22 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 17 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs BOS | 03-21 | L | 27 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs DEN | 03-19 | W | 20 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ CHI | 03-17 | L | 26 | 12 | 7 | 2 | 19 | 14 | 9 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| @ BKN | 03-09 | L | 29 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 17 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| vs LAC | 03-08 | L | 18 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 8 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| vs POR | 03-05 | L | 27 | 12 | 8 | 2 | 20 | 14 | 10 | 22 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| @ MIN | 03-04 | L | 24 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 18 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| @ IND | 03-01 | W | 34 | 7 | 14 | 3 | 21 | 10 | 17 | 24 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| @ DAL | 02-28 | W | 26 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 16 | 13 | 7 | 18 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs GS | 02-26 | L | 22 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs SAC | 02-24 | L | 21 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 15 | 10 | 7 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| @ MIA | 02-22 | L | 25 | 9 | 6 | 4 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 19 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| @ POR | 02-08 | L | 28 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 15 | 12 | 11 | 19 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| @ POR | 02-07 | L | 22 | 11 | 4 | 3 | 15 | 14 | 7 | 18 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| @ TOR | 02-01 | L | 18 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
FAQ
Where can I find Walter Clayton Jr. Rebounds odds today?
This page shows live Walter Clayton Jr. Rebounds odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.
How are Walter Clayton Jr. Rebounds projections calculated?
Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Walter Clayton Jr.'s Rebounds so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.
What sportsbooks offer Walter Clayton Jr. Rebounds props?
Optimal Bet compares Walter Clayton Jr. Rebounds lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current NBA schedule.
Should I bet the over or under on Walter Clayton Jr. Rebounds?
Use the projections section above to see how Walter Clayton Jr.'s projected Rebounds compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.