Rhamondre Stevenson Rushing + Receiving Yards
Rhamondre Stevenson is projected for 65.3 rushing + receiving yards. He has cleared 39.5 in 10 of his last 10 games (100%).
Rhamondre Stevenson projections and betting odds for Rushing + Receiving Yards. Compare lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and other sportsbooks.
Props & Odds
Rushing + Receiving Yards O/U 39.5
65.3projHit rate vs Over 39.5
- Last 5
- 100% 5 of 5
- Last 10
- 100% 10 of 10
- Last 20
- 80% 16 of 20
- Last 35
- 77% 27 of 35
Projected range
projection 65.3Most likely 45.0–85.7 Typical 26.6–104.1
Rushing + Receiving Yards O/U 59.5
65.3projHit rate vs Over 59.5
- Last 5
- 80% 4 of 5
- Last 10
- 90% 9 of 10
- Last 20
- 60% 12 of 20
- Last 35
- 63% 22 of 35
Projected range
projection 65.3Most likely 45.0–85.7 Typical 26.6–104.1
Rushing + Receiving Yards O/U 79.5
65.3projHit rate vs Over 79.5
- Last 5
- 40% 2 of 5
- Last 10
- 50% 5 of 10
- Last 20
- 40% 8 of 20
- Last 35
- 40% 14 of 35
Projected range
projection 65.3Most likely 45.0–85.7 Typical 26.6–104.1
Recent games
| Opp | Date | W/L | ATT | YDS | TDS | REC | TGT | YDS | TDS | Any TD | FM |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs PIT | 09-20 | W | 6 | 43 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| @ SEA | 09-10 | L | 18 | 51 | 0 | 5 | 6 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs SEA | 02-08 | L | 7 | 23 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| @ DEN | 01-25 | W | 25 | 71 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs HOU | 01-18 | W | 16 | 70 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs LAC | 01-12 | W | 10 | 53 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 75 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs MIA | 01-04 | W | 7 | 131 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 22 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
| @ NYJ | 12-28 | W | 8 | 47 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 55 | 1 | 2 | 0 |
| @ BAL | 12-22 | W | 8 | 51 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| vs BUF | 12-14 | L | 6 | 50 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs NYG | 12-02 | W | 12 | 40 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ CIN | 11-23 | W | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs CLE | 10-26 | W | 14 | 34 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ TEN | 10-19 | W | 18 | 88 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| @ NO | 10-12 | W | 13 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ BUF | 10-06 | W | 7 | 14 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 1 |
| vs CAR | 09-28 | W | 9 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs PIT | 09-21 | L | 4 | 18 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| @ MIA | 09-14 | W | 11 | 54 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 88 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs OAK | 09-07 | L | 7 | 15 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs LAC | 12-28 | L | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ BUF | 12-22 | L | 12 | 60 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| @ ARI | 12-15 | L | 13 | 69 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs IND | 12-01 | L | 18 | 73 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 21 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| @ MIA | 11-24 | L | 8 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
FAQ
Where can I find Rhamondre Stevenson Rushing + Receiving Yards odds today?
This page shows live Rhamondre Stevenson Rushing + Receiving Yards odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.
How are Rhamondre Stevenson Rushing + Receiving Yards projections calculated?
Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Rhamondre Stevenson's Rushing + Receiving Yards so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.
What sportsbooks offer Rhamondre Stevenson Rushing + Receiving Yards props?
Optimal Bet compares Rhamondre Stevenson Rushing + Receiving Yards lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current NFL schedule.
Should I bet the over or under on Rhamondre Stevenson Rushing + Receiving Yards?
Use the projections section above to see how Rhamondre Stevenson's projected Rushing + Receiving Yards compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.