Hansen Yang Points
Hansen Yang is projected for 2.9 points. He has cleared 4.5 in 2 of his last 10 games (20%).
Hansen Yang projections and betting odds for Points. Compare lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and other sportsbooks.
Props & Odds
Points O/U 4.5
2.9projHit rate vs Over 4.5
- Last 5
- 0% 0 of 5
- Last 10
- 20% 2 of 10
- Last 20
- 10% 2 of 20
- Last 51
- 14% 7 of 51
Projected range
projection 2.9Most likely 0.0–6.5 Typical 0.0–9.8
Points O/U 9.5
2.9projHit rate vs Over 9.5
- Last 5
- 0% 0 of 5
- Last 10
- 0% 0 of 10
- Last 20
- 0% 0 of 20
- Last 51
- 2% 1 of 51
Projected range
projection 2.9Most likely 0.0–6.5 Typical 0.0–9.8
Recent games
| Opp | Date | W/L | MIN | PTS | AST | REB | P+A | P+R | A+R | P+A+R | STL | BLK | S+B | 3PM | TO | DD | TD |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @ SA | 04-29 | L | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs SA | 04-26 | L | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs SA | 04-25 | L | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ SA | 04-20 | L | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs SAC | 04-13 | W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs LAC | 04-11 | W | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs WAS | 03-29 | W | 11 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 4 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs BKN | 03-24 | W | 9 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs UTA | 03-14 | W | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs IND | 03-09 | W | 4 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ ATL | 03-01 | L | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ CHA | 02-28 | L | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs DEN | 02-21 | L | 8 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ UTA | 02-13 | W | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ MIN | 02-12 | L | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| vs PHI | 02-10 | W | 5 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs MEM | 02-08 | W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs MEM | 02-07 | W | 4 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs CLE | 02-02 | L | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ NY | 01-31 | L | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| @ WAS | 01-28 | L | 12 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 11 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| vs TOR | 01-24 | L | 7 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ SAC | 01-19 | W | 9 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| vs LAL | 01-18 | W | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| @ GS | 01-14 | L | 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
FAQ
Where can I find Hansen Yang Points odds today?
This page shows live Hansen Yang Points odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.
How are Hansen Yang Points projections calculated?
Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Hansen Yang's Points so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.
What sportsbooks offer Hansen Yang Points props?
Optimal Bet compares Hansen Yang Points lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current NBA schedule.
Should I bet the over or under on Hansen Yang Points?
Use the projections section above to see how Hansen Yang's projected Points compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.