Austin Reaves — Points + Assists

lal G NBA

View real-time betting odds, AI-powered projections, and historical performance data for Austin Reaves's Points + Assists.

Projections

Points + Assists
28.79
16.3 Floor
28.8 Projection
41.2 Ceiling
Range Distribution
28.8
6.2 16.3 22.2 35.3 41.2 51.4
Probability Ranges
Very Unlikely 6.2 – 16.3
Bottom 10%
Below Average 16.3 – 22.2
10th–25th
Most Likely 22.2 – 35.3
25th–75th
Above Average 35.3 – 41.2
75th–90th
Exceptional 41.2 – 51.4
Top 10%

Game Logs

Betting Odds

Points + Assists

All Lines
44.5
39.5
34.5
29.5
29
28.5
24.5
19.5
Sportsbook Over 29.5 Under 29.5 Vig
+116
-154
6.9%
+102
-102
0.0%
-112
-118
7.0%
-114
-121
8.0%
-115
-125
9.0%
-116
-116
7.4%
-119
-119
8.7%
-122
-135
12.4%

Frequently Asked Questions

Where can I find Austin Reaves Points + Assists odds today?

This page shows live Austin Reaves Points + Assists odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.

How are Austin Reaves Points + Assists projections calculated?

Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Austin Reaves's Points + Assists so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.

What sportsbooks offer Austin Reaves Points + Assists props?

Optimal Bet compares Austin Reaves Points + Assists lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current NBA schedule.

Should I bet the over or under on Austin Reaves Points + Assists?

Use the projections section above to see how Austin Reaves's projected Points + Assists compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.