Carlos Narvaez Singles

bos IF MLB

Carlos Narvaez projections and betting odds for Singles. Compare lines from DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and other sportsbooks.

Next Game May 9

Props & Odds

Singles

0.5
0.0 Floor
0.5 Projection
1.0 Ceiling
0.5
0.0 0.0 1.0 3.0
Very Unlikely 0.0 – 0.0
Below Average 0.0 – 0.0
Most Likely 0.0 – 1.0
Above Average 1.0 – 1.0
Exceptional 1.0 – 3.0
Line Comparison
1.5
0.5
Book Over 0.5 Under 0.5
Optimal Bet Optimal Bet
+156 -152
theScore theScore
+140 -180
Hard Rock Bet (FL) Hard Rock Bet (FL)
+140 -185
Hard Rock Bet (IN,CO,NJ,TN,VA,AZ,MI) Hard Rock Bet (IN,CO,NJ,TN,VA,AZ,MI)
+140 -185
DraftKings DraftKings
+136 -189
Onyx Odds Onyx Odds
+136 -189
BetMGM BetMGM
+130 -175
Fliff Fliff
+125 -205
Sleeper Sleeper
+122 -213
Fanduel Fanduel
+120 -
ParlayPlay ParlayPlay
+118 -222

Recent Games

FAQ

Where can I find Carlos Narvaez Singles odds today?

This page shows live Carlos Narvaez Singles odds from every major sportsbook including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, and more. Lines update in close to real-time so you can compare and find the best value.

How are Carlos Narvaez Singles projections calculated?

Optimal Bet reverse engineers player prop odds across sportsbooks and betting exchanges to calculate projections. Instead of a single number, we generate a full probability distribution for Carlos Narvaez's Singles so you can see the range of likely outcomes and where the value sits.

What sportsbooks offer Carlos Narvaez Singles props?

Optimal Bet compares Carlos Narvaez Singles lines from all major US sportsbooks and exchanges including DraftKings, FanDuel, BetMGM, Caesars, Fanatics, Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX, Novig, and more. Availability depends on the current MLB schedule.

Should I bet the over or under on Carlos Narvaez Singles?

Use the projections section above to see how Carlos Narvaez's projected Singles compares to each sportsbook's line. The best approach is top-down: compare odds across books to find where one sportsbook is offering better value than the rest. When a line is significantly off from the consensus, that's where the edge is.